Ein Gastbeitrag von Alex Thurston
Mali’s presidential elections, now
little more than two months away, were supposed to mark the country’s
triumph as a young and stable democracy. Mali approaches a milestone
– the second peaceful transfer of power from one elected leader to
another – that many political scientists consider the definition of
a consolidated democracy. Outgoing President Amadou Toumani Touré,
who has served since 2002, had hoped to leave his country a legacy of
peace, infrastructural development, and prosperity derived from
mining and other growth industries. Touré, often known by the
abbreviation “ATT,” has faced serious political and security
crises during his rule, including a bitter row over the country’s
new family code and attacks by Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb
(AQIM). Yet as of this fall, ATT’s legacy appeared basically
intact.
In January, the country that ATT will
pass to his successor grew more violent and less stable. Tuaregs in
the north, under the banner of the National Movement for the
Liberation of the Azawad (NMLA), launched a rebellion on January 17.
The NMLA says it wants to establish an independent state in what it
views as the Tuareg homeland, called Azawad. The rebellion responds
to longstanding Tuareg grievances concerning their perceived neglect
and marginalization by the government in the south. The fall of
Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi also set the stage for the uprising;
his side’s loss in Libya’s civil war removed a powerful mediator
in conflicts between Tuaregs and Sahelian governments (in 2009,
Qadhafi had mediated the settlement of the last Tuareg uprising in
Mali) and sent Tuareg fighters who had been loyal to Qadhafi back
home to Mali and its neighbors. The NMLA is a serious military force.
Since fighting began, the rebels have been occupying towns in
northern Mali. The Malian army, for its part, has focused on
defending strategic sites and targeting
the rebels with airstrikes.
The rebellion has caused a political
crisis in the south. Frustrated military families have protested in
the capital Bamako and other cities. Demonstrations have sometimes
verged on becoming pogroms against Tuaregs who reside in the south, a
development that could presage a larger wave of inter-ethnic
conflict. The president and his representatives have tried to
negotiate with both the protesters and the Tuaregs, but so far
without definitive success. The rebellion itself is in some sense a
rejection of ATT’s strategy for peace in the north, which included
a special regional development and security program.
The rebellion is also causing
humanitarian crises. Tens of thousands of refugees have fled into
neighboring countries. An estimated
30,000 people are internally displaced.
Displaced Malians, in and outside the country, are struggling to meet
their basic needs. Caring for them in the short term will strain the
capacities of governments and aid agencies, and resettling them will
present a long-term challenge. The war and the refugee crisis also
exacerbate the threat of food insecurity that troubles the entire
Sahel region. Drought,
increases in food prices, and shortages of aid could create mass
starvation for Mali and its neighbors, even without the other
problems currently at work. The fighting will hinder aid agencies
from reaching the hungry, and will distract the government from the
needs of civilians.
These
developments have complicated
Mali’s relations with key partners. The
rebellion is a matter of concern not just for Mali, but also for its
neighbors and for France. Different actors have taken different
approaches. Regional power Algeria, declaring it hopes to encourage a
peaceful solution to the conflict, has withdrawn some military
support from Mali. France and Mali, meanwhile, have jointly
denounced reported rebel atrocities, but on
other points the two governments diverge: France would prefer
an immediate ceasefire, while Mali appears to
want to continue using force, at least in the short-term. Finally,
claims of AQIM involvement in the rebellion are circulating, raising
the possibility that the rebellion will come to be understood by
Western governments as a dangerous opportunity for terrorists to
expand their foothold in the region. One potential long-term
trajectory for the war involves substantial Western military support
for Mali’s government, though for now Paris seemingly hopes to
avoid that scenario.
Mali’s government recently stated
it aims to crush the rebellion before April’s elections. Previous
rebellions, however, have lasted years. Prolonged and intense
fighting could compel the government to delay the elections, or face
the unappealing alternative of holding the vote at a time when large
portions of the country could not fully participate. Whenever the
transition comes, it seems ATT may leave his successor a Mali riven
by conflict and plagued by humanitarian problems.
Alex Thurston promoviert an der
Northwestern University (Chicago) über Islam in Afrika. Thurston
betreibt den Sahelblog, den größten englischsprachigen Fachblog
über die Staaten der Sahel-Zone. Als Gastkommentator schreibt er
u.a. für The Guardian und Foreign Policy.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen